For
the past three weeks, I have had the privilege of moving across all regions
of this country courtesy of the leading debating society in Uganda (the Uganda
Debate Society). While in the various regions that we went to, we held debate
tournaments that attracted the higher institutions of learning within the area.
I know for a fact that for every region, all universities there were covered
and some of the other tertiary institutions. The assumption for purposes of
this article is that those institutions brought their best or close to their
best students and the other assumption is that given the nature and caliber of
the tournament, those institutions put in a given level of effort that would
warrant any serious tournament. I must say with all honesty that the level of
engagement exhibited by the students was far below standard. The measure or
yardstick that I employ in this judgment is basic command of the English
language, basic argumentation, knowledge of basic information by any student of
higher learning and ability to make a consistent argument for averagely five
minutes. This is a fair bar of assessment in my opinion and one expected
especially for students in institutions of higher learning.
Two
causes of the problem in my opinion, either our institutions are not doing
enough or probably as students we are also not doing enough to make ourselves
better. I will not call into question the accreditation of some of our
institutions but allow me examine the second limb of the problem cause and that
is with the students. As a little boy in my primary five, I remember vividly the
very first debate I engaged in, it was such a disaster. I couldn’t put together
two sentences during the debate and yet I had no history of stammering, I was a
relatively fine English speaker considering my age then. However, I noticed
that perhaps out of fright or even being the first time, I needed to better
myself. And for that reason alone, I went to work, I wanted to be a fine
speaker, one who the result of the debate would depend on, but I knew for that
to happen I needed to find a way of improving. I was better in my next
engagement and I kept working, I am certainly much better now than I was 12
years ago.
With
time, I noticed that for one to be able to speak, the most fundamental thing is
that they must have read because it is very difficult to sustain an argument
for more than a minute if you have no knowledge of the subject and you only get
this knowledge through reading. I know that many arguments are made without
reading and they are sustained with little knowledge but for an argument to be
properly constructed, given good grounding and perfectly premised you must have
read and have knowledge on the same. The greater part of me thinks (and I stand
to be corrected) that the reason why the level of engagement/debate in our
community is not improving is because we don’t give it time. I am a great
admirer of fine speakers and for that reason alone I pay so much attention to
the US Senators. Aside from articulation and language, they have so much
knowledge on the subject which often guides their discussion. Perhaps we could
say that many of our members of Parliament are not giving us an example but as
a matter of fact, there are those who take time off to acquaint themselves with
certain subjects and whenever they rise to speak, everyone settles to listen.
Debate
just like any sport is supposed to be rewarding and like any sport it should be
practiced and perfected overtime. I can tell without any fear of contradiction
that when you stop training, like any sport you decline. I see athletes go the
gym every day; they are trying to perfect their art and just like them, debate
should be a daily practice. The only difference is that debating, if done well,
will shape your personality, your intellect and your beliefs. Perhaps I can cut
the students I saw some slack because many confessed to have only made their
debut appearances during those tournaments. However, this can’t be an excuse
for failing on every basic there is.
Our
greatest misgiving as a generation is the failure to learn from our mistakes and
the failure to desire to learn. We are without a doubt the majority but we
stand a risk of not being heard if we can’t express ourselves even in the most
basic of ways.
True story bro. The ministry of education and sports should come up with a strong policy execution over debate in schools.
ReplyDeleteNothing could be more apt.
ReplyDeleteThis is a surgical sight of our nation's reality and how grateful I am that you choose the noble and voiced it. Thank you Patrick
Mr. Patrick the point you touched is pivotal in society.
ReplyDeleteBut as I said and I will always say, the Mirror starts by looking at the maker before it’s sold, let’s check our own systems first, then we can engage other societies.
Until we solve small bitting issues, like the feel of ownership of the system,corruption, and unfair judgements(sometimes).
Most of the people I know stopped debating or lost morale because they feel the system that adjudicates is marred with dire inconsistencies ranging from favoritism to having no standard form of adjudication.
sometimes voices are not enough
Nice piece here.
ReplyDelete